Mercedes-Benz R230 trunk soft-close latch repair
NikleinR6 traced intermittent trunk closing assist to leaks around the latch housing’s ball-bearing plugs. His repair and later owners’ follow-ups show both restored operation and recurring faults.
Select a photo to view its source post. The source may require sign-in.
An intermittent trunk closing assist
NikleinR6 described a trunk that temporarily regained its closing assist after a reset, then lost the function again. His account focused on air escaping around ball-bearing plugs in the latch housing. He reported that an initial silicone treatment did not hold and described resealing the leaking areas with a plastic adhesive. This is one owner’s repair account, not confirmation that every R230 closing problem has the same cause.
The reported leak and sealing work
NikleinR6 attributed the leak to cracks around the ball-bearing plugs and described sealing the affected housing areas with a plastic adhesive. In an August 2010 follow-up, he said the mechanism had worked for months without another battery reset. Later owners reported both continued operation and recurrence, so the original claim of a permanent repair remains unproven. Answering a later question, he explicitly said not to apply epoxy to any air hoses or hose connectors. That clarification distinguishes the housing’s ball-bearing plug areas from the working air connections.
Adhesive choice and hose interference in another repair
Yepster reported that an initial superglue attempt did not work, but plastic epoxy restored the closing assist. On that assembly, removing the pneumatic compartment made six ports accessible. During reassembly, the black air hose obstructed the release mechanism, causing the trunk to close and immediately reopen; rerouting and securing it resolved that behavior. These are that owner’s installation experiences, not a guarantee for every adhesive or vehicle.
Some repairs recurred and led to replacement
On mwpersonal’s 2004 SL55, initial restored closing assist still left a trunk-closed recognition problem. In a later post, the owner said the adhesive repair lasted a couple of weeks, then a repeat attempt lasted only a few closes, leading to replacement of the closer. sebi0214 also reported operation for only two or three cycles after a sealing attempt. The second vehicle’s cause and any effect of adhesive choice were unconfirmed. These outcomes qualify the original promise of a permanent repair. Stricko initially reported restored operation after reassembly, then edited the same post to say it had failed again a few days later. The contributor had not reopened the assembly to confirm whether the adhesive had failed, so the recurrence does not establish a particular product as the cause.
Some owners reported longer follow-up
moretech first reported five months of continued operation and later said the repair had solved his problem eight months earlier. next2pool said his repair was still holding a year later, contrasting it with the earlier four or five cycles after a reset. Jan T also reported that his sealing repair was holding after several months. These owner follow-ups add time context to the shorter successes; they do not erase the separate recurrence and replacement failures elsewhere in the thread.
A two-year follow-up, alongside shorter reports
moretech reported that the epoxy repair was still working two years later. ArrArr separately reported restoring his newly purchased SL55’s soft close after sealing the ports and reinforcing a cracked diaphragm-retaining tab, but gave no follow-up duration. These are attributed owner reports; they do not establish a general success rate.
bigdthep’s sealing and latch-position follow-up
bigdthep reported leaving the adhesive overnight and restoring soft-close operation. He initially heard some escaping air, then later clarified that the hiss lasted about a second and stopped while the trunk stayed shut. He also reported marking and readjusting the latch position. Rudeney distinguished a brief actuation hiss from continued hissing after the latch had operated. The photographs belong to bigdthep’s report; they do not establish an independently verified adhesive specification or long-term outcome.



A reply adds two more leak locations
JBFMCAR reported that sealing four ports had not worked on his assembly. He later found six locations in total, described a repeat attempt, and subsequently said the closing assist was working after all six were sealed. His report qualifies the original four-port description rather than proving that four ports are always sufficient.
Source reply ↗ · JBFMCAR